{"id":8095,"date":"2023-05-26T07:42:37","date_gmt":"2023-05-26T14:42:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/?p=8095"},"modified":"2025-01-24T09:22:29","modified_gmt":"2025-01-24T17:22:29","slug":"i34the","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/?p=8095","title":{"rendered":"Superconducting <em>I<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration:overline;\">4<\/span>3<em>m<\/em> CSH<sub>7<\/sub> Model Applied to Resistive Transition Temperature Data for Compressed C-S-H at High Pressure"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Superconducting <em>I<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">4<\/span>3<em>m<\/em> CSH<sub>7<\/sub> Model Applied to Resistive Transition Temperature Data for Compressed C-S-H at High Pressure<\/strong>, Dale R. Harshman and Anthony T. Fiory [<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.48550\/arXiv.2201.01860\">arXiv_3<\/a>]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">This article updates version 1 by restricting consideration to only the resistive data and excluding the questioned 287.7-K datum reported for carbonaceous sulfur hydride in Snider et al., Nature <b>585<\/b>, 373 (2020). The superconducting transitions are considered in terms of the theoretically-discovered compressed <em>I<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">4<\/span>3<em>m<\/em> CSH<sub>7<\/sub> structure of Sun et al., Phys. Rev. B <b>101<\/b>, 174102 (2020), which comprises a sublattice similar to <em>Im<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">3<\/span><em>m<\/em> H<sub>3<\/sub>S with CH<sub>4<\/sub> intercalates. Positing an electronic genesis of the superconductivity, a model is presented in analogy with earlier work on superconductivity in <em>Im<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">3<\/span><em>m<\/em> H<sub>3<\/sub>S, in which pairing is induced via purely electronic Coulomb interactions across the mean distance \u03b6 between the S and H<sub>4<\/sub> tetrahedra enclosing C. Theoretical superconducting transition temperatures for <em>I<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">4<\/span>3<em>m<\/em> CSH<sub>7<\/sub> are derived as <em>T<\/em><sub>C0<\/sub> = (2\/3)<sup>1\/2<\/sup>\u03c3<sup>1\/2<\/sup>\u03b2\/<em>a<\/em>\u03b6, where \u03b2 = 1247.4 \u00c5<sup>2<\/sup>K is a universal constant, \u03c3 is the participating charge fraction, and <em>a<\/em> is the lattice parameter. Analysis suggests persistent bulk superconductivity with a pressure-dependent \u03c3, increasing from \u03c3 = 3.5, determined previously for <em>Im<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">3<\/span><em>m<\/em> H<sub>3<\/sub>S, to \u03c3 = 7.5 at high pressure owing to additionally participating C-H bond electrons. With an and \u03b6 determined by theoretical structure, calculations of <em>T<\/em><sub>C0<\/sub> at the highest pressures, 258 and 271 GPa, are in agreement with resistive transitions to within an overall uncertainty of \u00b1 3.5 K.<\/p>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1000\" height=\"833\" src=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig1.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8117\" srcset=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig1.jpg 1000w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig1-300x250.jpg 300w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig1-768x640.jpg 768w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig1-150x125.jpg 150w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig1-180x150.jpg 180w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><b>FIG. 1.<\/b> Schematic structure of <em>I<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration: overline;\">4<\/span>3<em>m<\/em> CSH<sub>7<\/sub>, indicating the four distances \u03b6<sub>1<\/sub>, \u03b6<sub>2<\/sub>, \u03b6<sub>3<\/sub>, and \u03b6<sub>4<\/sub> for calculating the average \u03b6, the H<sub>4<\/sub>-tetrahedron, and coordinates of S ions located at cube corners.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1000\" height=\"955\" src=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig2-sm.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8122\" srcset=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig2-sm.jpg 1000w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig2-sm-300x287.jpg 300w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig2-sm-768x733.jpg 768w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig2-sm-150x143.jpg 150w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig2-sm-157x150.jpg 157w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><b>FIG. 2.<\/b> The extracted \u03c3<sup>(X)<\/sup> from resistance data (open circles) as defined in Eq. (3), plotted as a function of pressure <em>P<\/em>.  The solid blue curve is a fit of the function \u03c3(em&gt;P) from Eq. (5) to the data.  The dotted curves represent the calculated uncertainty.  The dashed horizontal lines at 3.5, 5.5, and 7.5 correspond to charge fractions for H<sub>3<\/sub>S (7\/2), H<sub>3<\/sub>S + H<sub>4<\/sub> (11\/2), and H<sub>3<\/sub>S + CH<sub>4<\/sub> (15\/2), respectively. Questioned resistive datum: pink color.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1000\" height=\"956\" src=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig3-sm.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8125\" srcset=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig3-sm.jpg 1000w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig3-sm-300x287.jpg 300w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig3-sm-768x734.jpg 768w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig3-sm-150x143.jpg 150w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig3-sm-157x150.jpg 157w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><b>FIG. 3.<\/b> Measured resistance transition temperature <em>T<\/em><sub>C<\/sub> vs. pressure <em>P<\/em> after Ref. 1 (open circles).  The solid blue curve is <em>T<\/em><sub>C0<\/sub>(<em>P<\/em>) from Eq. (6) to the data.  The dotted blue curves represent the calculated uncertainty. Questioned resistive datum: pink color.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1000\" height=\"922\" src=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig4_tc0tcp2q-sm.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8129\" srcset=\"http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig4_tc0tcp2q-sm.jpg 1000w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig4_tc0tcp2q-sm-300x277.jpg 300w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig4_tc0tcp2q-sm-768x708.jpg 768w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig4_tc0tcp2q-sm-150x138.jpg 150w, http:\/\/physikon.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/Fig4_tc0tcp2q-sm-163x150.jpg 163w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><b>FIG. 4.<\/b> Measured <em>T<\/em><sub>C<\/sub> vs. calculated <em>T<\/em><sub>C0<\/sub> for compressed high-<em>T<\/em><sub>C<\/sub> superconductors; <em>I<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration:overline;\">4<\/span>3<em>m<\/em> CSH<sub>7<\/sub> (258-271 GPa), <em>Fm<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration:overline;\">3<\/span><em>m<\/em> LaH<sub>10<\/sub> (169 and 192 GPa) [29], <em>Im<\/em><span style=\"text-decoration:overline;\">3<\/span><em>m<\/em> H<sub>3<\/sub>S (155 GPa) [27], HgBa<sub>2<\/sub>Ca<sub>2<\/sub>Cu<sub>3<\/sub>O<sub>8+\u03b4<\/sub> (25 GPa) [28], YBa<sub>2<\/sub>Cu<sub>3<\/sub>O<sub>8<\/sub> (12 GPa) [29], A15 Cs<sub>3<\/sub>C<sub>60<\/sub> (0.93 GPa) [30], FeSe<sub>0.977<\/sub> (7.5 GPa) [43], Fe<sub>1.03<\/sub>Se<sub>0.57<\/sub>Te<sub>0.43<\/sub> (2.3 GPa) [43], and C\/C (twisted bilayer graphene device D2, 1.33 GPa) [44].  The solid line represents Eq. (1), highlighting the equality between <em>T<em><sub>C<\/sub> and <em>T<\/em><sub>C0<\/sub>.<\/em><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p>Dale R. Harshman and Anthony T. Fiory, <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2201.01860\">arXiv:2201.01860v3 [cond-mat.supr-con] (2023)<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8095","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-tc-superconductivity","category-high-tc-theory","category-transition-temperature"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8095","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8095"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8095\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8367,"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8095\/revisions\/8367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8095"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8095"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/physikon.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8095"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}